People v. Whitcomb
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding, the Grievance Committee and this Court have been called upon to review the unprofessional conduct of the respondent, George H. Whit-comb. As a result, we now order that the respondent be suspended for one year and one day.
The respondent was admitted to the bar in 1967, is registered as an attorney, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court and its Grievance Committee.
In February 1980, the respondent filed a civil action on behalf of his clients, Viroj Chongkoltanalob and Krissada Narumit, in the Denver District Court. The defendants were…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. LustigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022