Legal Opinion

Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1927No. Docket No. Sac. 3894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal is one taken by the plaintiff from an order of the superior court of Shasta County, made on October 30, 1925, relieving the respondent upon this appeal from its alleged default arising out of its failure to give the notice and request for a transcript upon an appeal taken by it in the same action and pursuant to the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The facts with reference to these two appeals are as follows: On April 30, 1925, the jury in the above-entitled cause returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant therein…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stenzel v. KronickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Stoner v. Security Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bernschein v. WhitakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Preo v. RoedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Dreyer v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Gross v. HazeltineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Baum v. VanattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API