Legal Opinion

Gross v. Hazeltine

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 10722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

By reason of an oversight this cause was prematurely submitted for decision and decided, in disregard of a stipulation of the parties allowing time for the filing of further briefs. Upon petition for rehearing this fact was brought to our attention and the decision (269 Pac. 925) was promptly set aside to permit of further briefing and particularly to allow respondent to urge a point which he stated had “not been raised in California as yet.” Examination of the briefs so filed and of the contention most strongly relied on by respondent, which contention will receive consideration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Estate of BerglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Strehlow v. MothornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Moore v. StrayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. McCordic v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Sherman v. PannoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Cowee v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API