Legal Opinion

Brown v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1917No. L. A. No. 5149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the certification by a judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County of the stenographic reporter’s transcript for use in support of an appeal from a judgment. John M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is a proceeding in mandate to compel the certification by a trial judge of the stenographic reporter’s transcript, as provided in section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, for use in support of an appeal prosecuted by petitioner from a judgment rendered against her in a case entitled Tropical Investment Co. v. Edna A. Brown.

The principal ground for the refusal of the trial judge to certify the transcript was that the notice for the preparation of the same was not filed with the clerk of the superior court within the time prescribed by law. The law requires such notice to be filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fiske v. GosbeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Tasker v. WarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Miller v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hume v. LindholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API