Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Security Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1920No. Civ. No. 3175PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL fr.om a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. K. S. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

The plaintiffs, children and only heirs at law of Vandoren Stoner, claiming to he the owners of a certain note and mortgage, executed to the decedent during his lifetime, brought this action to recover the same from the defendants, and for certain sums of money alleged to have been collected thereon. Defendants answered, alleging ownership of the note and mortgage in defendant Katze, by an absolute and bona, fide assignment, and that the defendant, Security Trust Company, held the same as collateral security' for certain loans made to defendants Katze and Coyne. The lower court gave judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. MacKay v. Clark Rig Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Federal Home Loan Bank v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API