Stenzel v. Kronick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The plaintiff and respondent herein has moved this court to affirm the judgment in his favor, from which this appeal has been taken, upon two grounds: (a) That no sufficient record is before the supreme court upon which said court can predicate error; (b) that no sufficient record on appeal in this case has been printed in appellant’s brief.
The facts upon which the respondent predicates his motion are these: The judgment herein in plaintiff’s favor was made and entered on December 19, 1923. Notice of entry of said judgment was served upon attorneys for the defendant on December 29, 1923. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Des Granges v. Des GrangesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Estate of BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Rubin v. Platt Music Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by14 opinions
- Colburn Biological Institute v. DeBoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lynch v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Hawn v. HawnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.