Legal Opinion

Dreyer v. Cole

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13195PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs quieting their title to real property. Respondents first contend that this court may not consider the reporter’s transcript prepared under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the alleged reason that the notice for its preparation was not filed within the time provided for by statute. This contention is based on the fact that the notice was not filed within ten days after a motion for a new trial, made in the case, was denied by operation of law by reason of the mandatory provisions of section 6 60 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Francisco Credit Clearing House v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Preo v. RoedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Biaggi v. MaineroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Ward v. ParkfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. State Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Stark v. Pioneer Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Holibaugh v. ItoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API