Legal Opinion
Woods v. Berry
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1931No. Docket No. 3843PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. McDANIEL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendants ’ motions for change of place of trial from Shasta County to the city and county of San Francisco, and granting respondents’ counter motion to retain the cause in Shasta County.
It is agreed that the action is a transitory one. (Chew v. Storrie, 108 Cal. App. 313 [291 Pac. 610].) This case was here before on motion of respondents for affirmance; opinion filed April 4, 1930. (Woods v. Berry, 105 Cal. App. 90 [286 Pac. 1073].) The facts of the case are sufficiently stated therein.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Yedor v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Brouwer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cholakian & Associates v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Fahlstrom v. DenkOregon Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.