Bernschein v. Whitaker
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in- the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The ten days’ time “after notice of decision” denying a motion for new trial or “other termination” of such a motion, within which a party may file demand for record under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, or may serve a proposed hill of exceptions under section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, commences to run immediately upon the failure of the trial court to pass on the motion within three months after the verdict of the jury or service on the moving party of notice of decision of the court. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 660.) Written notice of the decision denying the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Preo v. RoedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Wrynn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- McArthur v. PaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.