Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Karpe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
In its declaratory judgment action, appellant Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company moved for a súmmary judgment that the uninsured motorist clause in its automobile insurance policy did not cover injuries sustained by respondent Dale E. Karpe during the improper use of an auto motive maintenance tool by an uninsured third party. The trial court found respondent entitled to recover uninsured motorist benefits under the policy and summary judgment to that effect was entered. We affirm.
FACTS
This case is appealed on stipulated facts. Respondent Dale E. Karpe (Karpe) was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Classified Insurance Corp. v. VodinelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Brehm v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. GoebelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Minnesota Property Insurance v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017