Minnesota Property Insurance v. Slater
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment in favor of respondent Minnesota Property Insurance, appellant Carol Pierce argues that the district court improperly determined that two insurance policy exclusions applied. Because the district court did not err in its interpretation of the terms of the insurance policy, we affirm.
FACTS
William Slater purchased a 1985 International cabover truck on a rent-to-own basis from Larry Hanson. The truck was operable but in need of general repair to bring it into compliance with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) regulations for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. LillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Medmarc Casualty Insurance v. Angeion Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006