Legal Opinion
Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 13, 1987No. C1-86-456PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
In a suit against his no-fault automobile insurer, a patron of a self-service gasoline station contends that injuries sustained by him when he slipped on ice and fell on the station’s concrete apron after filling and capping his car’s gas tank arose out of the “maintenance” of a motor vehicle as the word “maintenance” is used in the Minnesota No-Fault Act. Minn.Stat. § 65B.46, subd. 1 (1986). A panel of the court of appeals agreed. Accordingly, it reversed a trial court summary judgment in favor of the no-fault insurer. 1
We reverse.
Respondent, Rodger Marklund, refilled the gas…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- North River Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Block v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Ply v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Christensen v. General Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.