Legal Opinion

Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Goebel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 1993No. C0-93-631PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.

Appellant Horace Mann Insurance Company challenges the trial court’s determination that its insured, respondent Earl Goe-bel, is entitled to no-fault economic loss benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination whether its insured, respondent Earl Goe-bel, is entitled to no-fault economic loss benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act. The parties stipulated to the following facts:

1. On October 20, 1988, Earl Goebel brought his 1988 Plymouth van into Fergus Motors, which is located in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Monaghan v. PA. MFRS.'ASS'N INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. KarpeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medicine Lake Bus Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API