Legal Opinion

Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 79-1516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in the cause sub judice is whether the purchase of tangible personal property used in the initial “pickling” process is excepted from Ohio sales and use taxes. More narrowly construed, the threshold issue is at what point does appellant’s manufacturing or processing of tangible personal property for sale begin?

Appellant asserts the manufacture of commercial fasteners begins with the initial pickling of the hot rolled rods. We agree.

R. C. 5739.011 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

*270“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Interlake, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Van Dyne Crotty Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Copperweld Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. DeNoon v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. DeNoon v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API