Legal Opinion

Van Dyne Crotty Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1990No. Nos. 89-1670 and 89-1671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Prior to November 15, 1981, companies that cleaned the tangible personal property of others and companies that operated a towel and linen service neither paid sales tax on purchases of items used directly in their businesses nor collected sales tax on transactions with their customers. According to former R.C. 5739.01 (E)(4), a retail sale did not include:

“* * * [S]ales * * * in which the purpose of the consumer is:

U * * *

“(4) To use or consume the thing directly in industrial cleaning of tangible personal property; to use or consume the thing directly in cleaning of the tangible personal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gressel Produce Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pioneer Linen Supply Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1995
  2. Moore Personnel Services, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. MECH. LAUND. & SUPPLY v. Dept. of Rev.Indiana Tax Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API