Legal Opinion

Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1950No. 32171PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

By the language employed in Sections 5546-1 and 5546-2, General Code, the obvious intent of the General Assembly was to impose an excise tax on every retail sale made in the state of Ohio of tangible personal property, with certain specified exceptions.

Section 5546-1, General Code, relating to “sales,” and Section 5546-25, General Code, relating to “use,” as they pertain to the instant case, except from taxation only those sales where the purpose of the consumer is to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Terteling Bros. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Courier Citizen Co. v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Interlake, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Babcock & Wilcox. Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API