Legal Opinion
Interlake, Inc. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1975No. 74-634PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue in this case is whether the coking equipment is excepted from Ohio sales and use taxes.
*458Appellant contends that the equipment is excepted from the tax by R. C. 5739.01, which reads, in part:
“(E) ‘Retail sale’ * * # include[s] all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
(C # # #
“(2) * * * to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property
for sale by manufacturing, processing * * * .
* #
“ (S) ‘ Manufacturing’ or ‘processing ’ means the transformation or conversion of material or things into a different state or form from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ormet Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Ball Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.