Legal Opinion

Interlake, Inc. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1975No. 74-634PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether the coking equipment is excepted from Ohio sales and use taxes.

*458Appellant contends that the equipment is excepted from the tax by R. C. 5739.01, which reads, in part:

“(E) ‘Retail sale’ * * # include[s] all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:

(C # # #

“(2) * * * to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property

for sale by manufacturing, processing * * * .

* #

“ (S) ‘ Manufacturing’ or ‘processing ’ means the transformation or conversion of material or things into a different state or form from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ormet Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ball Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API