Legal Opinion
Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1973No. 72-766PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue in this case is whether certain equipment purchased and used by appellant in the production of ferro-alloys is excepted from the Ohio sales and use taxes.
R. C. 5739.01(E) (2) provides, in part:
“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
í i * * *
“(2) To incorporate the thing transferred as a material or a part, into tangible personal property to be produced for sale by manufacturing, assembling, processing, or relining, or to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by26 opinions
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Solite Corp. v. County of King GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Interlake, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Foster v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.