Legal Opinion

Copperweld Steel Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1987No. 86-1482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this case is whether certain equipment purchased and used by appellant during the audit period in the production of its specialty grade steel alloys is exempt from sales and use taxes.

I

During the period encompassed by the audit, R.C. 5739.01 provided, in pertinent part:

“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:

* *

“(2) * * * [T]o use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property * * * for sale by manufacturing, processing, refining, or mining * *

The terms…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Concord Publishing House, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Bird & Son, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. City of Bowling Green v. BoggsBowling Green County Municipal Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API