Legal Opinion

DeNoon v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1989No. 88-1012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, C'.J.

R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) excepts from Ohio sales tax items purchased by a taxpayer that are used or consumed directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing or processing.1 During the relevant audit period, “manufacturing” was defined in R.C. 5739.01(R) (also numbered [S]), in pertinent part, as:

“* * * the transformation or conversion of material or things into a different state or form from that in which they originally existed * * *.”

In Youngstown Bldg. Material & Fuel Co. v. Bowers (1958), 167 Ohio St. 363, 5 O.O. 2d 3, 149 N.E. 2d 1, syllabus, this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Semac Industries, Inc. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stoneco, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API