Legal Opinion

Mead Corp. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1950No. 31941PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The Mead Corporation has filed an appeal in this court, under Section 5611-2, General Code, from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, in which appeal the appellant complains that the board acted unreasonably and unlawfully in affirming final orders of the Tax Commissioner assessing a sales or use tax on certain purchases of tangible personal property made by appellant’s Chillicothe division during the years 1944 to 1947, inclusive.

This is another of the cases coming from the Board of Tax Appeals in which, under existing statutes, this court is called upon to assume the role of a second…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dye Coal Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Welfare Federation v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Brockton Knights of Columbus Building Ass'n v. Assessors of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API