Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Seib

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1942No. L. A. 17975PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The plaintiff, in an action to establish a trust and for money had and received, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after an order sustaining general and special demurrers to the plaintiff’s third amended complaint without leave to amend.

The complaint in question, the allegations of which must be regarded as fr.ue on this appeal from a judgment, after demurrers, contains two counts. The basis of the'plaintiff’s claim is stated,in the first cause of action substantially as follows: One Elizabeth J, Herbst, now deceased, owned a house and lot in Los Angeles. In January, 193Í, she…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API