Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Rowley

California Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1950No. L. A. 21075PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Thomas J. Rowley, a real estate broker, represented Louis Steiner and his wife in connection with their purchase of certain real estate. He is now being sued by them to recover the amount of his commission, an alleged secret profit and exemplary damages. The appeal is from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining Rowley’s demurrers to the complaint.

The pleading is in four counts. In the first one, the Steiners allege that Rowley was employed by them as such broker under an oral contract and he owes them $2,000 because it was paid to Mm for their use and benefit. More specifically, it is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API