Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge Authority

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1953No. Sac. 6377PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs 1 appeal from a judgment entered on the sustaining without leave to amend of defendants’ 2 general demurrer to plaintiffs' complaint for injunction, mandamus, and general relief. In plaintiffs’ language, "This is an action to restrain the California Toll Bridge Authority and the Department of Public Works from proceeding with the construction and financing of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. . . . The complaint seeks a temporary restraining order and a preliminary and permanent injunction restraining Defendants from proceeding with the proposed construction work and the financing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Maxwell v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sipper v. UrbanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API