Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kidd

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1915No. Sac. No. 2001PublishedCited by 157 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action was brought to set aside a deed purporting to convey property in the town of Williams, Colusa County, known as the “W. H. Williams Brick Warehouse,” and also seven lots in block 36 in said town, made by W. H. Williams to the defendant Laura Belle Kidd, under her name of Laura Miller, and prior to her marriage with the defendant, P. E. Kidd.

Plaintiff and intervener are the daughters and residuary legatees under the will of W. H. Williams, deceased. Defendant Laura Belle Kidd is the grandniece of said Williams and the purported .conveyance to her was dated September 30, 1901. W. H.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API