In re the Estate of Burdick
California Supreme Court
Appeals from a decree of final distribution, from an order refusing to suspend the decree of distribution, and from an order denying a motion for distribution to trustees. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
December 12, 1892, the executor of the above estate filed his final account, and prayed for a settlement thereof, and for a distribution. The bill of exceptions stated “ that by said final account it appeared that, after payment in full of all claims against the said deceased and said estate, the expenses of the last sickness and all funeral charges, and all accrued expenses and charges of the administration of said estate, there remained in the hands of said executor a balance in money of eighteen hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty-one cents, from which said executor asked to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Packard v. ArellanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by86 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.