Bury v. Young
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, from an interlocutory decree of partition, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action of partition. Plaintiff and defendant Young are sisters, and also daughters of one M. A. Hinkson For title to support their respective claims Mrs. Bury relies upon a deed from her father, and Mrs. Young claims as a devisee under her father’s will. While suffering from a paralytic stroke, Hinkson called to his bedside for legal advise, as to the disposition of his property, one Hazen, an attorney-at-law, and acting upon his advise he signed and acknowledged a grant deed of his real estate, wherein his aforesaid daughters were named as grantees. This deed he gave to Hazen,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Hathaway v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Wallace v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Latham v. UdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Stone v. DuvallIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Donahue v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.