Legal Opinion

Knox v. Knox

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1946No. 34,291PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment decreeing defendant to be a constructive trustee of realty for plaintiff’s use and benefit. After entry of the judgment plaintiff died, and Elizabeth Knox as administra-trix was substituted in his place and stead.

In 1931, the plaintiff, James M. Knox, while still living with and married to defendant, Sadie M. Knox, by assignment from Jesse Van Valkenburg, who was then his attorney, became the owner of a mortgage executed by Amy A. Hurd on lot 1, block 5, L. F. Menage’s Addition to Minneapolis, except the front 11 feet thereof. These premises, improved…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Lufkin v. JakemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Thompson v. NesheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API