Legal Opinion

Piedmont Paving Co. v. Allman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1902No. S.F. Nos. 2160-2161-2162PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

These three actions. were brought to enforce a street assessment against different lots in Oakland belonging to the defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the appeals therefrom are presented upon the judgment-roll without any bill of exceptions.

The city council of Oakland passed a resolution of its intention to order that Vernon Street, between certain termini, “be graded, curbed with wood where not already done in cement, to the official line and grade, and macadamized with class 'C ’ macadam, gutters four feet wide; also, that culverts of class ‘A’ be constructed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bay Rock Company v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Grant v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Parks v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City St. Improvement Co. v. KrohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API