Legal Opinion
Ferry v. O'Brien
California Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1922No. L. A. No. 6762PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
The following portion of the opinion of the district court of appeal for the second appellate district, division one, covering the facts of the case, and decisive of the main issues arising upon the trial and upon appeal, is hereby adopted as the opinion of this court:
“This is an action to foreclose a lien claimed by reason of an assessment for street work alleged to have been done under contract pursuant to the procedure outlined in the street work act of 1885, commonly known as the ‘Vrooman Act’ [Stats. 1885, p. 147]. The defendant Winifred F. Marr appeals from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Voigt v. Detroit CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Goodrich v. DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thain v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cowart v. Union Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- County of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hoffman v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.