Legal Opinion

Sharum v. City of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1914No. 4922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. C. Allen, Judge. Injunction by A. H. Sharum against the City of Muskogee, a municipal corporation, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This is a suit in equity, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, to enjoin the enforcement of a special assessment levied against his property in payment for paving certain streets situated in street improvement district No. 122, in the city of Muskogee. The defendants below, defendants in error herein, were the city of Muskogee, its duly elected municipal officers charged with the power and duty of providing for such improvements, and the firm of contractors to whom the contract for the improvement was awarded. The court below granted part of the relief prayed for, whereupon…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ogden City v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Gilmore v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Norris v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Crabb v. Uvalde Paving Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. City of Ardmore v. AppollosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Missouri Farm Bureau Federation v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API