Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Equitable Fire & Marine Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1933No. Docket No. 4897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant insurance company has appealed from a judgment, which was rendered against it pursuant to the verdict of a jury, in a suit upon a fire insurance policy for the total loss by fire of a dwelling-house and furniture. It is contended a previous arbitration and appraisal of the property which was made pursuant to the provisions of the policy is binding upon the 'insured and renders the judgment ineffectual and void.

The plaintiff, Mrs. E. C. Stockwell, was the owner of a dwelling-house at Chico of the value of approximately $4,500, together with furniture of the value of about $500.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lutz v. LinthicumSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Curtis v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Pour Le Bebe, Inc. v. Guess? Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Pacific Crown Distributors v. Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Martin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API