Legal Opinion
Martin v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1933No. Docket No. 5014PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Supervisors of Lake County to issue to her a license to sell nonintoxicating beverages at a restaurant in Nice. It is contended the application therefor was arbitrarily denied without affording the petitioner an opportunity for a legal hearing thereof.
On May 22, 1933, pursuant to the provisions of section 4041.14 of the Political Code, in the exercise of its police power, the Board of Supervisors of Lake County enacted Ordinance No. 202 under the provisions of an act of the legislature enacted in April, 1933, entitled:
“An act to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bleuel v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Stockwell v. Equitable Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Reed v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Ritz v. LightstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People ex rel. Hall v. Supervisors of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Carroll v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wyatt v. Tahoe Forest Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Desert Turf Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.