Legal Opinion
Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel Associates
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1996No. A071368PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
Respondent Georgina Cheng-Canindin brought a wrongful termination suit against the owners and management of her former employer, the Parc Fifty Five Hotel (the Hotel). Appellants Renaissance Hotel Associates and Lawrence Chan are two of the defendants in the wrongful termination action who petitioned the trial court to compel respondent to participate in “mandatory contractual arbitration” of her claims. Appellants contend the trial court erred by denying their petition and refusing to compel respondent to submit her dispute to the Hotel’s “Review Committee”…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation v. Paul Mantor, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
- Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.