Legal Opinion

Pacific Crown Distributors v. Brotherhood of Teamsters

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1986No. A027072PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Brotherhood of Teamsters and Auto Truck Drivers, Local 70, appeals an order of the Alameda County Superior Court which vacated a labor arbitration decision awarding backpay benefits to union member Clarence Lahey. The trial court found (1) the arbitrator’s award was procured by corruption, fraud and other undue means, and (2) the arbitrator exceeded her authority by granting the remedial measure.

I

During trial appellant chose not to rebut any of the facts as stated by respondent Pacific Crown Distributors, accordingly, we have relied on those same…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Pour Le Bebe, Inc. v. Guess? Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Blatt v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API