Legal Opinion
Sapp v. Barenfeld
California Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1949No. L. A. 20682PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
On December 31, 1946, appellants contracted to reconstruct a building owned by respondents that had been damaged by fire. It was agreed that appellants were to restore the building to the condition it was in immediately before the fire in accord with the original plans and specifications. Work was to begin within 15 days and to be completed within 180 days thereafter. Any dispute arising under the contract was to be submitted to arbitration. A dispute arose over the alleged failure of the appellants to perform the work according to the specifications and to finish it on time. Appellants…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Popcorn Equipment Co. v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.