Pour Le Bebe, Inc. v. Guess? Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
Appellant Pour Le Bebe (PLB) seeks reversal of trial court orders confirming an arbitration award and denying PLB’s petition to vacate the award. The parties’ dispute revolved around a series of “license agreements” under which PLB was granted the right to utilize the trademarks of respondent Guess?, Inc. (Guess), at first in the manufacture and sale of infant’s and children’s clothing and accessories, and later in the manufacture and sale of home furnishings. Guess claimed that PLB had failed pay royalties required under the agreements. PLB asserted a number of counterclaims…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Farris v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade SecuritiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Coastal Environmental Rights Found. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.