Curtis v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
The plaintiff sued upon an award made in pursuance of an instrument in writing, purporting to have been made on the 29th of July, 1878, “ by and between the plaintiffs and the board of trustees of the city of Sacramento, representing and acting for said city.” Pursuant to the terms of the instrument the question of the value of some professional services which had been rendered by the plaintiffs for the city of Sacramento was referred to two arbitrators—one to be selected by the plaintiffs,°and the other by the board of trustees—who were to meet as soon as convenient, and after hearing such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lutz v. LinthicumSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Elmendore v. HarrisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
- Day v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Falconer v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1802
- Rigden v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. SeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Stockwell v. Equitable Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. Bonner Mercantile Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1890
- Lang v. BadgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Smith v. Campbell & Facciolla, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.