Legal Opinion
Mills v. City of Elsinore
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1928No. Docket No. 6280PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
The board of trustees of the City of Elsinore, a city of the sixth class, on March 12, 1925, passed resolution of intention No. 117 declaring its intention to construct a water supply and distributing system for fire protection and domestic water supply, it being declared therein that the proceedings were being taken pursuant to the “Improvement Act of 1911” [Stats. 1911, p. 730] and the “Improvement Bond Act of 1915” [Stats. 1915, p. 1441]. Steps were subsequently taken resulting in the acceptance of the bid of the defendant Claude Fisher for the performance of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- City St. Improvement Co. v. KrohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kane v. WedellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Duncan Development Corp. v. Crestview Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Lloyd v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Beutz v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.