Spring Street Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders refusing a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
These actions, separately brought, were both for the purpose of having declared void the same special assessment based on benefits received by the land under the widening of Eighth Street in the city of Los Angeles, and so to enjoin the collection of the sums charged by the assessment against the properties of plaintiffs. The two cases involving, as they do, the same considerations of law, may be determined together. The appeals in both eases are from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for new trial.
The authorities of the city of Los Angeles decreed the widening of Eighth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Allen v. DrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Reclamation Dist. No. 70 v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Schaffer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by70 opinions
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Knox v. City of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.