Legal Opinion

Kane v. Wedell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1921No. Civ. No. 3923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, who are the governing officials of the city of San Bruno, in an action brought by the plaintiffs as citizens, residents, and taxpayers of said- city, to restrain said defendants as such officials from proceeding with the levy and collection of certain assessments upon the property of said plaintiffs and other property owners within said city for the purpose of procuring money with which to consummate the purchase and acquisition of “the San Bru-no water system” from its owners and its operation thereafter as a municipal water…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Minnesota & M. Land & Improvement Co. v. City of BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mills v. City of ElsinoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. McGarry v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API