Legal Opinion
Irish v. Hahn
California Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9622PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a street assessment. Judgment went for the defendants and' the plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone.
The city of Pasadena acquired by purchase an electric lighting plant and distributing system for the purpose of furnishing to said city and its inhabitants electric current for light, heat and power. The purchase price was the proceeds of a general municipal bond issue voted for that purpose. No question is raised as to the power of the city generally to acquire, maintain and operate said plant and system, including the construction of underground…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Jones v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Knox v. City of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.