Legal Opinion
Federal Construction Co. v. Ensign
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 3984PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Petitioner, to whom the board of trustees of the city of Dinuba awarded a contract for the performance of certain public work, brings this proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent, as the city superintendent of streets, to execute the contract.
The city of Dinuba, a municipal corporation of the sixth .class, is provided with a complete sewer system. It owns a parcel of land outside of and distant about two miles from its corporate limits, on which it has constructed a sewage disposal plant, consisting of a septic tank and its appurtenances, constructed some years ago for the disposal of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Bryant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.