City of Whittier v. Dixon
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
By this proceeding in mandamus petitioners seek to compel respondent city clerk to countersign a warrant for the payment of the costs of publication of an ordinance of intention, in a proceeding for the formation of Vehicle Parking District No. 1 of the City of Whittier, under the Vehicle Parking District Act of 1943. (Stats. 1943, ch. 971, p. 2859; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1943, Act 5131.3.) Respondent has refused to countersign the warrant contending *666that the statute pursuant to which the publication was made, is invalid. The regularity of the proceedings is admitted. It is established that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.