Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. City of Redondo Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Certain property owners within an assessment district, who sued to enjoin respondents from executing a contract awarded pursuant to proceedings had under the “Improvement Act of 1911” for the extension of the municipal pier, appeal from a judgment of nonsuit.

Their first point is that they should have been allowed to prove that no permit for such extension had ever been obtained from the federal authorities as required by an act of Congress of March 3, 1899 (U. S. Code, Ann., title 33, sec. 401, p. 377) and that, upon such proof, they were entitled to the injunction, as, in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Southlands Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Harrison v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheekbank v. HobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In Re the Habeas Corpus of WellsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API