Steinhardt & Bro. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8126 (T. D. 37494). [Oral argumént Apr. 20,1818, by Mr. Washburn and Mr. Baldwin.]
1Opinion of the Court
Dé Vries, Judge,
delivered the opinion of tbe court:
The merchandise the subject of this appeal is- aptly described in the answer to protest by the local appraiser as follows:
The merchandise consists of elastic braid composed of silk and india rubber, returned for duty irrespective of the component material of chief value as braid at 60 per cent ad valorem, paragraph 358, act of 1913. Note G. A. 7626, T. D. 34887, sustaining action.
Also elastic webbing composed of artificial silk, cotton, and india rubber, the proportion of value shown on analysis to be
Per cent.
Rubber.'. 26. 39
Cotton. 39.31
Artif…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. GavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Thomass v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- United States v. Linen Thread Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Louisville Bedding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Accurate Millinery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.