Louisville Bedding Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise here involved consists of rags, the component materials of which are wool and cotton. The rags are pieces of cloth of varying sizes and irregular shapes, some very small, none large, and are the clippings or cuttings resulting from cutting to pattern cloth used in the manufacture of cheap clothing. As imported, none of the pieces appears to be large enough for any fabric use. After importation, they are shredded and used to stuff mattresses and as *329journal-box packing, wiping, etc. Tbe wool content of the rags is from 50 to 60 per centum in bulk and is of the greater value. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Imperial Wall Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Vantine v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Linen Thread Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohn & Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- P. Silverman & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- American Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Curtis & Von Bernuth Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.