Legal Opinion

Steinhardt & Bro. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 6, 1911No. 536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7119 (T. D. 31026).

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court: .•

This appeal involves the construction of the final clause of paragraph 164 of the tariff act of 1909, which reads:

164. * * * Needle cases or needle books furnished with assortments of needles or combinations of needles and other articles, shall pay duty as entireties according to the component material of chief value therein.

The merchandise consisted of needle books of hand sewing and darning needles, bodkins, scissors, and buttonhooks. The books are made up of paper, designed and adapted for holding needles. The storing of the needles…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartranft v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Chin & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. Strauss Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API