United States v. Linen Thread Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
This is an appeal by the Government from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the protests of the appellee to the collector’s assessment of plain-woven fabrics of flax at 40 per *360centum ad valorem, under paragraph 1010 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Par. 1010. Woven fabrics, not including articles finished or unfinished, of flax, hemp, ramie, or other vegetable fiber except cotton, or of which these substances or any of them is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for, 40 per centum ad valorem.
The appellee claimed in its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Vantine v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Drew v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cohn & Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Louisville Bedding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Accurate Millinery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Varsity Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.