Legal Opinion

United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1923No. 2239PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case was reported by the appraiser at the port of New York to consist of boots, composed of cotton. and india rubber, and was assessed for duty by the collector at 30 per cent ad valorem, under the provisions of paragraph 256 of the tariff act of 1913, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

Clothing, ready-made, and articles of wearing apparel of every description, composed of cotton or other vegetable fiber, or of which cotton or other vegetable fiber is the component material of chief value, or of cotton or other vegetable fiber and india rubber, made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. United States v. Auto Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. Dow Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. Silvine Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API